Participation: Internet Democracy

It is the most unavoidable of truths – words are not enough to form a message. The once infallible black and white rows have now been deemed dull. Their meanings are understood but kept solitary, unable to be passed from mind to mind (any attempt would result in smeared sentences and confetti bursts, the clumsy tears of clumsier paper). Information is noted but offers no reward. It is merely read, tucked away in thoughts and left to hide there. There is no call for participation. There is no need for debate. The facts are merely absorbed and then abandoned.

This must change – and it slowly is.

Through utilization of Internet Democracy (where information is filtered through all avenues of social networks: blogs, live feeds, online radio broadcasts and more), individuals can achieve a far more satisfying level of participation within their politics. Instead of merely tossing newspapers onto tables, hoping articles are found by ones who share their interests, they can send links and web pages to all of their contacts. A petition can be flung across the world, with the needed signatures begged for. Video files – embedded with campaign speeches and unexpected gaffes – can be uploaded for all to enjoy. Even the impending votes within local governments can be noted, explained for all of their complexities. The access is immediate… and so is the response.

Internet Democracy is founded on the principles of active encouragement. Individuals are to understand the world and then share their findings with others through the easy use of forums, sites and email. Information is able to bound from screen to screen, allowing it to reach millions instead of the fortunate few who glimpsed it in an editorial. It becomes a collective effort, pushed through by all who read it; which
allows for it to then be fully understood.

And this is vital.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Youth Discovered: Internet Democracy

The generations forever change. Years pass and reveal new notions, new beliefs. The once standard practices fall, replaced to current needs; and the only certainty is that youths will forever think their elders mistaken in all things. The separation of decades is too great to bridge. And adolescent minds are determined to not even try. Their interests are instead globalized -  with words being sent across the online playground, offered to strangers and continents. They search the Internet for truths and thrills, ignoring the typical media outlets (now branded slow and ineffectual). Their knowledge of the world increases, even as their knowledge of politics doesn’t.

Few youths consider laws and social reforms to be of interest – if only because these are so often contained to the dry text, the recitations of the television. These hold little fascination for the modern minds. They cannot appeal. So they must therefore be changed into something more accessible.

Internet Democracy has become a way for younger individuals to seek policies. With the aid of their familiar message boards and podcasts, they can become aware of the government and its changes (without having to suffer through the tedium of traditional methods). Exposure is broad and often laced to entertainment. Facts mingle with embedded videos and blogging tirades. And the surroundings are recognized, which offers a level of comfort. There are no feelings of inadequacies for those with limited experience. There is instead the certainty of finding understanding.

Internet Democracy is often disregarded by those reliant still on television and the crisp pages of magazines to offer proof of politics. There is an assumption that online information is invalid and without credibility. Instead, however, it has become a quick way to discover how a country is formed – with youths taking advantage of the techniques they’ve already learned. Mastery of a computer leads to mastery of reforms.

And this encourages activism within a generation that was once without it.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Internet Democracy: The Concerns of Facts

There can be no denying the value of the virtual world: truth is offered with a startling immediacy, able to be examined by the masses without care or pause. Statistics and campaigns are provided without hesitation – allowing for a politicking public to learn all they wish. Social policy can be found with the press of a button. A computer monitor can become a gateway to reforms. And the emergence of this medium has led Internet Democracy to become one of the most coveted of resources. Generations are relying on their screens to offer clarity.

But such clarity may not always be accurate. It may instead be a collection of false facts and wayward opinions.

There is no form of censorship on the Internet. This is often claimed to be an advantage (and rightly so). The intention is to promote the exchange of ideas, even those that are not considered popular within the majority. The rules are decided by the individual; and web pages are governed by an assumed code – one of ethics,  responsibility and trust.

That trust is not always well-founded, however.

Internet Democracy is dependent on honesty. When that is denied, the information individuals read (and believe) is filled to deceptions and unfounded accusations. These can damage the reputations of candidates, specific laws or even the forums themselves. It is vital therefore that there be no blind acceptance of anything that is posted on message boards or social networks.

And this is not always an easy thing: there is the expectation of truth, the assumption that all political words are well intended. Mistakes are far too common, however, and a deliberate slip of the fingers can change the entire meaning of a sentence – which can shade all opinions far differently than they would’ve been.

Censorship cannot exist online. The understanding that information can be false, however, must still be recognized. Be cautious. Be sensible. Be prepared to question all that’s read.

Enhanced by Zemanta